Corporate Social Responsibility in South Africa and Ghana: a Comparison of Successes, Failures and Futures in a “Developed” and an “Undeveloped” African Country

somatic Social certificate of indebtedness in south Africa and capital coast a comparison of successes, failures and futures in a developed and an undeveloped Afri stomach country Few industries affect the social, scotch and environmental sectors to the extent that the tap pains does. As exploitrals increase expanded, so the transnational aw beness of its impacts grew. mining-related polity, both supranationally and nationally, has evolved meaning(a)ly in the gone two decades, actively aimed at ensuring embodied Social office (CSR), where companies argon held accountable for their actions.In ripening countries equivalent southwestern Africa and gold coast that atomic number 18 heavily aquiline on meretricious trade and the associated internationalistic investment, the challenge is to jibe that environmental and social impacts of excavation atomic number 18 mitigated, that non-renewable resources are converted into national wealth and that tap-generated r evenue is claimed and disbursed. In this paper the phylogenesis of CSR in southwest Africa, a much developed African Nation, and gold coast, a little(prenominal) developed African nation, are compared.Recommendations are made as to authority avenues for CSR progression. The objectives of international mining indemnity enlighten fork up potpourrid dramatically in the past hardly a(prenominal) decades. During the 1970s the aim of mining policy was to increase judicature control. During the 1980s the aims of regenerate became to increase investment and to mitigate the socio- scotch impacts of mining. This was displace through the Growth Employment and reconstruction plan in SA (Fig, 2005), and the Economic recuperation Plan in Ghana (Hilson, 2002). twain plans advocated to a greater extent privatization, trade liberalization and deregulation. Although the widely distri exactlyed international trend was to redefine the spot of the state, particularly in industrial area s, the bridal of this ambition by African countries has proved detrimental. Biersteker (1990) argues that the reduction of the state greatly cut its act to govern, particularly undercutting its regulatory ability, its function as a mediator in civil disputes and its ability to regulate and assemble with the private sector.Campbell (2005) poses that this is because the legislative and regulatory reform espouse by umteen evolution mining-dependent African countries during the past few decades has undermined the persona of the state and has proved incompatible with the challenges of the countries concerned. This has stricken the ability of these governances to exert CSR squeeze on mining companies. CSR in Africa has grown check to these changes in the role of the state, and international mining legislation has had varying impacts on SA and Ghanian regulations.patronage organism based on a non-renewable resource, the main theme in changing international legislation is that of sustainable phylogenesis, particularly in underdeveloped countries in which a large percentage of mining is done by orthogonal companies. It is, however, the self-reliant right of a state to form its natural resources. This sovereignty was vehemently upheld by post-colonial maturation nations that rely on mineral resources, two prominent examples of which being SA and Ghana.It has force apparent, however, that mining has far- rack uping impacts that very(prenominal) much strike transboundary degrade effects, resulting in international attempts at regulation. CSR in South Africa The formal terms of CSR in SA were originally raised in 1972 and the sop up deal outn by many product linees was that they should non down to take responsibility for Apartheid, besides should rather improve social standards in spite of appearance their respective railway linees.These concepts were formalized in the Sullivan Principles, which were aimed at entrenching non-discrimination in the workplace into the core personal credit line activities, particularly in SA-based US companies (Visser, 2005). Although other(a) CSR groups formed, like the Consultative Business Movement, the move away from unselfishness only rattling became evident after the first republican elections in 1994, and when the Bneediness Economic dominance Programme (BEE) was introduced. The aim of BEE is to promote qualified racial will power, education, training and local frugal development.In 2002 the goal for black ownership in the mining sector was stage at 26% within 10 years (Fig, 2005). BEE was particularly important in the mining sector, as in club to obtain mining rights, businesses had to oppose the requirements of a BEE scorecard. A number of principles pay off been introduced to target human rights, a study CSR concern in SA. These include self-imposed Principles on Human Rights and Security and the OECD peril Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Gov ernance Zones (Hamann, 2009).A nonher important milestone was the Kings embrace, released in 2002, which outlined the CSR requirements for companies, including recognizing that stakeholders much(prenominal) as the community in which the union operates, its customers, its employees and its suppliers amongst others need to be considered when developing the system of a accompany (Visser, 2005). It withal requires that businesses piece annually on their social, transformation (including BEE), ethical, safety, wellness and environmental management policies.A cocksure and innovative spinoff of the Kings Report was the introduction of a Kings Index on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Companies are required to meet the criteria of the Kings Report in align to list with the JSE, providing a fiscally competitive incentive to adopt CSR principles (Dale, 2005). This innovative legislation forms the beginnings of a seemingly conk CSR framework. But the SA political relation struggle s to maintain the pressure needed to enforce all of its requirements. As in Ghana, SAs dependence on the mining effort makes the government abhor to confront deviant companies for fear of disinvestment and hypothecate losses.Firms often run philanthropic programmes except as an attempt to maintain business as usual, satisfying the despoil minimum for CSR. The lack of government content is most prominent in environmental requirements. Many mining companies have introduced more(prenominal) stringent environmental management regulations and have change magnitude CSR spending, but Fig (2005) shows that imputable to lack of governmental pressure and in effect(p) sustainable coverage, many of the claims of these companies do not match their actions.In recognition of its weaknesses, however, the SA government has adopted provision for voluntary infringe resolution within its environmental legislation (Fig, 2005). As an example of a developing country embracing CSR, SA has be it self comparatively forward-thinking and successful. SA is at the forefront of CSR legislation in Africa. It is in the inability to enforce these laws that the clearest CSR similarities, and failures, with Ghana, a less developed African nation, can be seen. CSR in GhanaFor the past green years Ghana has enjoyed a thriving fortunate trade. However, due to governmental turmoil and changing mining and economical policy, by the beginning of the 1980s the gold-mining industry was virtually stagnant, and became the focal point in the countrys Economic recovery Programme in 1983 (Campbell, 2005). Ghana also received assistance from the valet banking company, the conditions of which resulted in the elimination of most barriers to entry for outside investors, including reducing integrated taxes, royalty payments, inappropriate exchange taxes and import duties.The company guardianship amounts negotiated by foreign investors were far to a higher place average and signify the exte ntto which the Ghanaian government was inclined(p) to go to stimulate the industry (Campbell, 2005). This also indicates the extent to which the government was and is prepared to turn a blind warmheartedness to companies exploitation of the country. Liberalized legislation resulted in an resemble 800-fold branch of the predominantly foreign-controlled gold mining industry in the past 20 years.But this growth has been accompanied by very weeny change in the feel of life of the Ghanaian people. In 2006 the multinational Council on archeological site and Metals claimed that gold mining has not only kick-started Ghanas economy, but that many of the big mining companies are committed to CSR. In contrast, Hilson (2007) argues locals lives have been worsened by the increased use of debark, relocations and environmental dilapidation. Because of the lax policies adopted by the government, the nations percentage of the mineral development profits has been minimal.Despite the 40% c ontribution of total merchandise export earnings that gold-mining in Ghana represents, the contribution to GDP is only 2-3% (Hilson, 2002). thitherfore the government lacks fiscal control, and as such(prenominal)(prenominal) cannot redirect funds efficiently towards development projects. The most formal adoption of international policy in Ghana was that of the worldwide excavation Initiative (GMI) in 1998. Ghanaian mining companies claimed that a series of propulsive and innovative community development projects empowering hoidenish communities and improving quality of life were to be initiated (Garvin, 2009).But others report that the mines are infringe on indigenous domain, resulting in ethnic dislocation, poverty, displacement and environmental damage. Promises of jobs and adequate stipend have been broken. This is evident in the relatively small-scale number of Ghanaians employed by mining companies, a mere 20 000, despite the immensesize of the industry (Garvin, 200 9). An interesting retort to growing unemployment is the intensification of small- outmatch, artisanal mining, nicknamed the galamsey.The galamseyhave become an important inwardness for support for many subsistence farmers who have been dis place, but their il good status has led to them being labelled hazardous and environmentally electronegative by the chamber of Mines (Bush, 2008). There is potential for both large and small scale miners to collaborate, as they have different methods and it is uneconomic for one to do what the other does. This has been proven by Goldfields, who have leased small portions of land to groups of galamsey. Most large-scale gold ines refuse to license their unused land for work, so the galamseyare obligate to mine lawlessly in order to eke out a living. Hilson (2007) accuses the large mining companies of supporting a massive military sweep aimed at eradicating the galamsey, which resulted in human rights violations and many forced removals. Inste ad of taking advantage of cooperative opportunities major mine operators in Ghana have resorted to the most common CSR endeavours amongst extractive mine companies the building of schools, clinics and libraries. These CSR projects are still predominantly philanthropic and unsustainable.Garvin (2009) determined, through a series of surveys, that although many locals perceived an increase in social welfare, they reported a crepuscule in security, increased crime, cyanide-poisoned water, and other environmental hazards resulting in a lack of recyclable agricultural land. Notwithstanding the urgings from the World Bank Industries Review, Departments for supranational Development, the UN, and limited pressure from the Chamber of Mines, most CSR programmes that go beyond philanthropy emphasize the expansion of existing practices such as pig-rearing, livestock and activities.These give little opportunity for advancement, provide little more than subsistence wages and definitely do not contribute to sustainable economic growth (Hilson, 2007). One of the largest problems with CSR in Ghana, and similarly in SA, is the lack of communication between government, companies and public. Mining companies enter into agreements with the national government, paying royalties of 9%, of which 3% go towards community development (Hilson, 2007). These monies pass through many layers of government and administration, and often very little reach the locals they are meant to resort.Inhabited land is often designated for mining with little or no consent from the inhabitants. Under the minerals and Mining dally (2006) mining companies are required to compensate displaced people for their crops and use of land, but these payments are still woefully undervalued (Hilson, 2007). Locals value their land quite differently from the value placed on it by mine employees and the lack of communication only worsens these discrepancies. The regulatory and reporting systems in Ghana are very poo r, effectively making the situation for many locals worse than that seen in SA.There have been few legal efforts made to devolve mining activities, thus the improvement of CSR practices is dependent on international legislation, NGOs and pressure groups. ever-changing the CSR pyramid There are certain drivers of CSR that are significantly different in developing countries than in developed countries like Europe and the US. Existing ensamples must be adapted to fit the individual demand of developing countries. One such model is Carrolls pyramid, consisting of 4 tiers economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibilities. muckleframe ask outframe drawframe Figure 1 Pyramid models for CSR drivers (adapted from Visser, 2006) Visser advocates thatto adapt Carrolls pyramid to developing countries, economic responsibilities are given the highest priority, followed by philanthropic, legal and ethical. The economic tier represents the need for businesses to not only ensure that direct foreign investment increases, alleviating poverty and unemployment, but that barely investment is generated, goods and services produced and stable radix built.Visser argues that the emphasis on philanthropy is inevitable because of the dire situation and poor quality of life in many developing countries thathave become reliant on giver assistance. Philanthropy has become ingrained in developing country CSR. The legal responsibilities are of lower priority because the pressure to tie to legislation in developing countries is less than in developed countries. In order to elicit response, both nationally and internationally, sustainable indicators must be developed allowing more accurate reporting of CSR successes and failures.Efficient and divers(a) indicators allow for better sustainable reporting and transparency. These indicators serve two main functions providing guidelines for company policy and government policy (Danegard, 2005). increase the number of indicators i ncreases the scope for surveys or investigations. info collected from these is usually validated by companies and government, and is, as yet, not mandatory. Although these inquiries may provide useful data, Danegard (2005) suggests that the use of third companionship verification may be indispensable where governments lack the capacity for collection and evaluation.References Biersteker, T. J. , 1990. cut the enjoyment of the State in the miserliness A Conceptual Exploration of IMF and World Bank Prescriptions. world(prenominal) Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 477-492. Bush, R. , 2009. Soon there will be no-one left to take the corpses to the morgue Accumulation and abjection in Ghanas mining communities. Resources form _or_ system of government, 34, 57-63. Campbell, B. , 2005. The Challenges of Development, Mining Codes in Africa and incorporated responsibility. In International and Comparative mineral natural law and insurance policy . International sinew and Resources rect itude &038 Policy.The Netherlands Kluwer Law International, pp. 801-822. Dale, M. , 2005. Comparative International and African mineral Law as Applied in the Formation of the New South African Mineral Development Legislation. In International and Comparative Mineral Law and Policy . International Energy and Resources Law &038 Policy. The Netherlands Kluwer Law International, pp. 823-852. Dalupan, M. , 2005. Mining and Sustainable Development Insights from International Law. In International and Comparative Mineral Law and Policy . International Energy and Resources Law &038 Policy.The Netherlands Kluwer Law International, pp. 149-168. Danegard, A. , 2005. Sustainable development indicators for the minerals industry Who needs them? What stakes discharge producing them? In International and Comparative Mineral Law and Policy . The Netherlands Kluwer Law International, pp. 621-626. Fig, D. , 2005. Manufacturing brownout Corporate Social Responsibility in South Africa. International Af fairs, 81(3), 599-617. Garvin, T. et al. , 2009. Community-company relations in gold mining in Ghana. Journa of environmental Management, 90, 571-586. Hamann, R. 2004. Corporate social responsibility, partnerships, and institutional change The case of mining companies in South Africa. Natural Resources Forum, 28, 278-290. Hamann, R. , 2003. Mining companies role in sustainable development the why and how of corporate social responsibility from a business perspective. Development gray Africa, 20(2), 237-254. Hamann, R. , 2009. South Africa The Role of History, Government, and Local Context. In Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin Springer, pp. 435-462. Hamann, R. &038 Kapelus, P. , 2004.Corporate Social Responsibility in Mining in Southern Africa Fair accountability or safe greenwash? Development, 47(3), 85-92. Hilson, G. , 2007. Championing the Rhetoric? Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghanas Mining Sector. GMI, 53. Hilson, G. , 2002. Harvesting mineral r iches 1000 years of gold mining in Ghana. Resources Policy, 28, 13-26. Littlewood, G. , 2000. The Global Mining Initiative steer to Mining 2000. Visser, W. , 2005. Corporate Citizenship in South Africa A Review of Progress since Democracy. JCC, 18, 28-38. Visser, W. , 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility in underdeveloped Countries. pp. 473-499.